Logged on as Anonymous
ADR Center for .eu attached to the Arbitration Court attached to the Economic Chamber of the Czech Republic and Agricultural Chamber of the Czech Republic (Czech Arbitration Court)
Panel Decision
§ B12 of the .eu Dispute Resolution Rules (ADR Rules)
Case No.: 01209 Time of Filing: 2006-06-20 13:50:46 Administrative Contact: Josef Herian Complainant Name: Formula One Licensing BV, Sean Corbett Complainant's Authorized Representative Name: Wild Schnyder AG, Rolf Wittenberg Respondent Name: EURid Respondent's Authorized Representative Name: Domain Name(s): FORMULA1 Other Legal Proceedings English summary of the decision: English summary of this Decision is hereby attached as Annex 1 Factual Background
On 29 November 2005, Dating.nl B.V. obtained the registration of the Benelux word trademark for “formula1”.
Dating.nl B.V. filed an application for the <formula1.eu> domain name on 7 December 2005 at 11:02:18.118 hrs.
EURid accepted the application.
On 5 May 2006, Complainant filed a Complaint against this decision.
For the <formula1.eu> domain name, the deadline to initiate ADR proceedings expired on 7 May 2006. For the <formula1.eu> domain name, the Complaint was, thus, not filed timely.Parties’ Contentions
- The Applicant abused the Benelux expedited registration when registering the Benelux word trademark “formula1”;
- The Applicant was granted a preferential treatment by his registrar;
- The registration of the domain name by the Applicant was abusive and speculative (with reference to Articles 21 and 22 of Regulation 874/2004 of 28 April 2004).Discussion and Findings
- Holders of prior rights shall be eligible to apply to register a .eu domain name during the Sunrise period (Article 10 (1) of the Regulation);
- Prior rights include registered national trademarks (Articles 10 (1) and 12 (2) of the Regulation);
- All claims for prior rights must be verifiable by documentary evidence which demonstrates the right under the law by virtue of which it exists (Article 14 of the Regulation);
- The prior right claimed cannot be later than the date on which the domain name application is received by EURid: on that date, the right must be valid, which means that it must be in full force and effect (Section 11.3 of the Sunrise Rules);
According to Benelux Trademark Law, an exclusive right to a trademark is acquired by a trademark registration (Article 3).
At the time of the application for the <formula1.eu> domain name, the Benelux word trademark referred to by the applicant as a prior right, incontestably existed.
EURid has no authority to assess the validity of a trademark.
A registrar must forward the applications in the chronological order in which they are received (Article 5 (2) of the Regulation). The effective performance of this rule is to be reviewed under the contractual rules agreed upon by the registrar and the applicant. EURid has no authority to examine compliance with such contractual rules. EURid and its validation agent should only take the applications in the chronological order in which the applications are received (Articles 14 (2) and 14 (10) of the Regulation).
Finally, a decision by EURid cannot be questioned on the basis of a speculative and abusive registration by the Applicant, which can only be initiated against the Applicant himself.Decision
the Complaint is DeniedPanelists
- Flip Jan Claude Petillion
Date: 2006-10-12 Annex 1
EURid has no authority to assess the validity of a trademark.
A decision by EURid cannot be questioned on the basis of a speculative and abusive registration by the Applicant, which can only be initiated against the Applicant himself.