{
    "case_number": "CAC-ADREU-001036",
    "time_of_filling": null,
    "domain_names": [],
    "case_administrator": null,
    "complainant": [],
    "complainant_representative": null,
    "respondent": [],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "The Panel is not aware of any pending legal proceedings relating to the disputed domain name.",
    "discussion_and_findings": "On April 26, 2006 the Complainant filed a complaint requesting the transfer of the disputed domain name to the Complainant. \r\n\r\nOn August 6 in accordance to Paragraph 2 (k) of the ADR Rules the Panel issued the following order:  “Pursuant to Paragrah § B7 (a) of the ADR Rules the Panel herein would like to receive from EURID, within the shortest possible time, the full list of the domain names registered by the Respondent in the present case during the phase 1 of the Sunrise, together with the PDF version of the corresponding supporting trademark registrations”.  \r\n\r\nOn August 29 EURID addressed to the Panel the information requested as received from EURID on August 28.\r\n \r\nOn August 30, 2006 the Complainant requested the Panel to suspend the ADR Proceeding until September 18, 2006 since the parties wished to initiate settlement negotiations. \r\n\r\nOn September 18, 2006 the Panel has been informed that the parties amicably settled the dispute. According to the agreement signed on September 9, 2006, the parties agreed “to settle the ADR Proceedings and have the domain name abc.eu assigned to SOK”. \r\n\r\nOn September 21, 2006, a formal confirmation of the settlement of the ADR Proceedings was requested to the Respondent. On the same day the Respondent confirmed to the Czech Arbitration Court that the parties had reached an agreement.",
    "decision": "In light of the above, pursuant to the article 4 (a) of the “ADR Rules” stating that “the ADR Proceeding will be understood to be concluded once the Panel has received confirmation from both Parties that an agreement has been entered into by the Parties concerning the object of the dispute”, the Panel herein acknowledges that the ADR Procedure is terminated.",
    "panelists": [
        null
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2006-10-25 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "The Complainant Suomen Osuuskauppojen Keskuskunta  and the Respondent Minerva GmbH Consulting - after having filed the ADR proceeding - decided to resolve the dispute entering into a settlement agreement which was independently confirmed by both parties.\r\n\r\nThe Panel, pursuant to Article 4 (a) of the ADR Rules, acknowledges that the ADR Procedure is terminated.",
    "decision_domains": [],
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}